Reviews by real users

Just finished a project using open source libraries and have fresh impressions?

Write a review to share your experiences with open source!

On DevRates we focus on reviews by developers using libraries on their daily work.

Technology radar

Launching a start-up or commercial project using open-source libraries? No time to evaluate various technology stacks?

Interested in the latest trends and top-rated open source projects for all layers of your application?

DevRates contains projects reviews of most popular tagged categories and programming languages.

Build your skill profile

Join DevRates and build your public profile from libraries you know and experience positions from projects you've been involved in.

Follow projects and don't miss any news from blogs and twitter on your wall.

Your company is looking for talented developers? Register on DevRates and show your technology stack on your company profile.


Related project


Review details

Created 1 year ago
Review score is 0

Overall review rating


I like Play's view engine that's looks like the ASP.NET Razor engine. I don't like the fact that Play largely ignores existing Java EE APIs (except JPA) and I like it even less that they (seemingly) switched to Scala on a whim, since at the time that was the most hyped language around. Will they move to Ceylon next when that happens to be the most hyped language at the time they'll be planning for Play 3?

Upgrading hasn't been a really fun experience either. Now, it most frameworks something breaks when you upgrade, but Play has been exceptionally bad here. I haven't used 2.x with Scala yet, but the 1.x Java version suffered from high memory usage and slow startup time. Now again, with most frameworks these days startup time is increased when the app gets bigger (mainly due to annotation scanning), but here too Play behaves a little on the extreme side. Again, this is for 1.x, perhaps 2.x is better.

Sign in to vote for review score: 0
Scroll to top